My first foray into BIM was with Architrion in the late 1980’s when I was trained to be a trainer, but by 1990~91 I gave up on it as not ready for real world projects.
#ARCHICAD TO REVIT SOFTWARE#
I think it would be better to pitch SketchUp as the choice for the star designer the student who stands out as the best designer in the class, and wants software with the greatest flexibility and design freedom that will carry through a career, not just a job. Sorry to say, but students learn REVIT primarily for the prospect of getting hired out of school, despite the fact that SketchUp’s advertising campaign is currently trying to make that claim. That’s not saying much about powers of design creativity. REVIT is most credited for helping to work out construction details with features like clash detection between structural and mechanical elements.
General impressions: REVIT is the preference of large firms doing big projects, while ArchiCAD appeals to small to medium sized firms. In more recent years, I would say the use of REVIT among them has grown, and SU shrunk a little, and I’ve seen better design work done in REVIT, so I can’t say it’s such a striking contrast anymore. Several years ago, I would say it was quite consistent that the more creative designs were done in SketchUp (I could usually tell SU output before even asking), while the work done by by students in REVIT were, well, rather uninspired designs. Over the course of several years sitting on Masters of Architecture thesis juries, I often asked what software the students used.
I’m not a current user of either program, so I can’t directly answer this, but I can make a few comments and throw SketchUp into the mix.
0 kommentar(er)
